Yes Bank532648Banking
Supreme Court upheld a Bombay High Court order on Yes Bank's AT1 bond cancellation, ruling the bank's administrator had no right to cancel the bonds, unsettling investor sentiment including Japanese FDI
By ScoutQuest · · 1 min read
- FDI stake in Federal Bank
- 98 percent
Heard on business television between 14:17:03 - 14:20:03 IST.
- Supreme Court upheld a Bombay High Court ruling on the cancellation of Yes Bank's AT1 bonds.
- Panelists explained the technicality: the administrator, not the bank or RBI, had cancelled the bonds, and the administrator had no rights to do so, since AT1 is treated as equity.
- Speakers noted a Japanese partner had put in significant money into Yes Bank, and the ruling raises concerns about policy and judicial predictability ('stroke of pen risk').
- It was cited as an example denting FDI/FII sentiment toward Indian banks, alongside the Tiger Global case.
Watch at source
behind live
- 1Open on YouTube
- 2Drag the seek bar left
- 3Watch this moment
Also from Yes Bank
Supreme Court AT-1 bond judgment: coupon decision on 9% bonds still pending
24 Oct 2026
Q2 FY27 call: Supreme Court AT-1 ruling seen cutting CET-1 by ~240 bps pro forma; net profit up 65%
23 Oct 2026
Yes Bank showed a negative technical structure with a death crossover near the 21 level, which is now an important resistance
21 Oct 2026
Source: Live TV News Channel · 16 Oct 2026
Nothing here is a view, opinion or recommendation of ScoutQuest, its parent, directors or employees. ScoutQuest is a technology company: this page was assembled automatically from public sources using artificial intelligence, and may contain errors or omissions. Confirm everything against the original source before you act on it. Any use of this page is at your own risk, and neither ScoutQuest nor its parent, directors or employees accepts liability for it.