ScoutQuest23 Oct 2026
TeamLease Services539658Ongoing legal dispute

Gujarat High Court grants ad-interim relief, stays EPFO proceedings against TLSU

Gujarat High Court order dated October 22, 2026 grants ad-interim relief to TeamLease Skills University, staying further EPFO proceedings under Section 125 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, on summons dated September 29, 2026.

By ScoutQuest · · 3 min read

High Court order date
October 22, 2026
EPFO summons date
September 29, 2026
Notice returnable date
December 01, 2026

Court order dated October 22, 2026

The High Court of Gujarat passed an order on the interlocutory application shared by TeamLease Skills University (TLSU), being Civil Application (for Direction) No. 2 of 2026 in R/Special Civil Application No. 7698 of 2026. TLSU is associated with TeamLease Services Ltd, which disclosed the order to the stock exchanges.

What the High Court ordered

What this means in simple terms

An ad-interim relief is a temporary protection given by a court while the case is still being heard. Here it means the EPFO authority's proceedings under Section 125 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, which had been listed before that authority for October 28, 2026, are stayed, or paused, until the next date of hearing before the High Court. This is an interim protection and the matter remains sub judice, that is, still pending before the High Court.

Background of the dispute

The core question raised by the EPFO

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, EPFO, Vadodara, shared an affidavit-in-reply on behalf of Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in the writ petition, in which it reiterated its position that trainees engaged under the National Employability Enhancement Mission (NEEM) framework fall within the definition of "employee" under Section 2(f) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and sought to justify the order dated March 11, 2026 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner.

TLSU's stated position

TeamLease Skills University strongly disagrees with the assertions made in the affidavit and states that it continues to pursue its legal remedies before the High Court of Gujarat, and believes it has a strong case on merits.

What to watch

The relief is interim in nature and the matter remains pending adjudication.

Source: BSE · 23 Oct 2026

Nothing here is a view, opinion or recommendation of ScoutQuest, its parent, directors or employees. ScoutQuest is a technology company: this page was assembled automatically from public sources using artificial intelligence, and may contain errors or omissions. Confirm everything against the original source before you act on it. Any use of this page is at your own risk, and neither ScoutQuest nor its parent, directors or employees accepts liability for it.

About ScoutQuest · Logos provided by Logo.dev