Managing Director served non-bailable warrant in consumer case execution; recall application shared

The Company has informed BSE that its Managing Director was served a warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

Thu 24 Sep 2026

Warrant Issued Date

23.09.2026

Original Order Date

08.01.2025

Issuing Authority

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad

Compliance Window

30 days from receipt of the order copy

Legal Response Shared

Application for recall and cancellation of non-bailable warrant; objections under Section 47 CPC; application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC

What was disclosed

The Company intimated BSE (Scrip Code 544852) under Regulation 30 that the Managing Director has been served with a warrant issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sector-12, Faridabad.

Key facts as stated

• Date of receipt of warrant: 23.09.2026
• Issuing authority: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridabad
• Alleged violation: non-compliance of the order dated 08.01.2025 passed in an execution petition under Sections 72/73 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
• Nature of action: issuance of a warrant in the said Execution Petition

Company's response

• Taking immediate legal advice
• Shared an application on behalf of Manoj Agrawal for recall and cancellation of the non-bailable warrant
• Shared detailed objections under Section 47 CPC in the Execution Petition
• Shared an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC in CC No. 67/2024 for setting aside the order dated 08.01.2025
• Application before the competent judicial authority for stay/recall of the warrant and resolution of the underlying execution matter has been shared

Company's stated position

The Company states it was never served with notice of the complaint and never received a copy of the order, although the order directed that copies be supplied free of cost. It says the compliance window of 30 days from receipt of the order copy never began to run, and that it has not received any payment from the complainant. It adds that no invoice, bill or payment in the present complaint pertains to it.

Impact as stated

The Company says the matter relates to an execution process for a consumer dispute, operations continue normally, and the event is not expected to have any material impact on its financial or operational performance.

How investors may read it

A warrant against a Managing Director in a consumer matter is a governance and legal-risk disclosure rather than a business event, and no monetary amount is stated. The outcome of the recall application and the underlying execution proceedings will determine how the matter progresses.

Nothing here is a view, opinion or recommendation of ScoutQuest, its parent, directors or employees. ScoutQuest is a technology company: this page was assembled automatically from public sources using artificial intelligence, and may contain errors or omissions. Confirm everything against the original source before you act on it. Any use of this page is at your own risk, and neither ScoutQuest nor its parent, directors or employees accepts liability for it.